United States of America v. Eight (8) Counterfeit Watches et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Eight (8) Counterfeit Watches and Assorted Counterfeit Clothing, Shoes, and Accessories
Claimant: Abdullah Luqman
Case Number: 1:2017cv00156
Filed: March 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Susan J. Dlott
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 41 DECREE OF FORFEITURE. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/29/2024. (rrs)
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss Claim. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/28/2024. (rrs)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/21/17. The government's 15 Motion to Strike Luqman's claim is DENIED without prejudice to renew should Luqman fail to comply with doc. 21 ; claimant's 4 Motion to Dismiss and 11 Motion for Return of Property are DENIED without prejudice to renew. (eh)
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 United States' Motion to Strike 3 Claim of Abdullah Luqman, or in the Alternative, to Compel Claimant Abdullah Luqman's Answers to United States' Rule G(6) Special Interrogatories, 4 Claiman t Abdullah Luqman's Motion to Dismiss, 11 Claimant Abdullah Luqman's Motion for Release of Certain Property. IT IS RECOMMENDED: (1) That the Government's Motion to Strike Luqman's Claim 15 be DENIED, without prejudice to ren ew should Luqman fail to comply with the separate Order entered this day directing him to supplement his responses to the Special Interrogatories; (2) That Claimant Luqman's motion to dismiss 4 and motion/petition for release of certain property 11 also be DENIED without prejudice to renew. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/28/2017. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Eight (8) Counterfeit Watches et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: William Bryan King, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eight (8) Counterfeit Watches
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assorted Counterfeit Clothing, Shoes, and Accessories
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Abdullah Luqman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?