Jones v. Lawrence County Sheriff's Department et al
| Robert N. Jones |
| Lawrence County Sheriff's Department and Ronald Hatfield |
| 1:2017cv00173 |
| March 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| LAWRENCE |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action is DISMISSED for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. An appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/15/17. (gs) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER that plaintiff's 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied as moot. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this case be Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/17/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/3/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
