Rose v. Bersa et al
Plaintiff: Brittany Rose
Defendant: Bersa, Eagle Imports and John Doe
Case Number: 1:2017cv00252
Filed: April 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: BUTLER
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER granting 39 Bersa's Motion to Dismiss, granting in part 44 Eagle Imports' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, granting in part 48 Rose's Motion for Discovery and for Extension of Time to File Response, denying 49 Rose's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery, and dismissing 37 Rose's Amended Complaint as it relates to her claims against Bersa for lack of jurisdiction. In accordance with this Opinion, the Courtfurther directs Rose and Eagle Imp orts to conduct discovery on the narrow issueof the Invoice's authenticity and converts Eagle Imports' Motion for Judgmenton the Pleadings to a Motion for Summary Judgment on the remaining question ofwhether Ohio's statute of repose ba rs Rose's claim. The parties are directed to confer with each other, and to inform the Court of an appropriate timetable for completing such discovery and providing supplemental briefing to the Court on the issues identified immediately above. If the parties are unable to reach an agreed resolution regarding such scheduling, they are directed to contact the Court to set a status callin this matter. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 8/31/20. (sct)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying part of 9 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 11 Motion for an Extension of Time to Serve Eagle Imports up to 8/20/17. Within 15 days from the date of this order: a. Plaintiff must re-serve Eagle Imports with a copy of the signed Summons and Complaint and file written notice on the Courts docket after doing so; b. Plaintiff must notify the Court, via written notice filed on the Courts docket, as to the status of her attempts to serve Bersa; c. Defendants attorneys clarify, via written notice filed on the Courts docket, which Defendant or Defendants they represent. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/19/18. (ba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Bersa et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Rose
Represented By: Robert Forsythe Croskery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bersa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eagle Imports
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?