Rahab v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Malik Rahab
Respondent: Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2017cv00412
Filed: June 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: NOBLE
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying 1 Petition. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/3/20. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends the Court issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering Petitioner's release from custody unless he has been, within ninety days, re-sentenced by a different trial judge. If the Court rejects this conclusion, it is recommended that it grant a certificate of appealability and pemit Petitioner to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/7/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Court issue a conditional writ of habeas corpus requiring the State of Ohio to release Petitioner unless he is re-sentenced by a different judge within ninety days of this Court&# 039;s judgment. If the District Court disagrees with this conclusion and denies the writ, it should grant Petitioner a certificate of appealability on the question whether vindictiveness played an unconstitutional part in his sentence. Reasonable j urists, including the dissenters in the Ohio Supreme Court, could conclude actual vindictiveness played a part in the sentencing. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/8/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rahab v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Malik Rahab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?