Dalmida v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Grady Dalmida |
Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution |
1:2017cv00488 |
July 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Susan J. Dlott |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 29 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability - Petitioners Motion, construed as being made under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), does not show manifest error of law in the judgment and should therefore be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 7/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/5/19. (kma) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations and dismissing with prejudice petitioners petition; petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that an appeal would be frivolous and petitioner is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. (vp) |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/11/2019. (kpf) |
Filing 21 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY 19 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/26/2019. (kpf) |
Filing 17 TRANSFER ORDER - With the consent of both of them, the Magistrate Judge reference in the above-captioned case is hereby TRANSFERRED from The Honorable Stephanie K. Bowman to The Honorable Michael R. Merz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 2/11/2019. (srb) |
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, the petition is administratively STAYED and TERMINATED on the Court's active docket pending petitioner's exhaustion of his Ohio remedies. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/9/2018. (jlw) Modified on 1/9/2018 (jlw). |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 Motion to Stay: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: The petition (Doc. 1) be administratively STAYED and TERMINATED on the Courts active docket pending petitioners exhaustion of his Ohio remedies. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/30/2017. (jlw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dalmida v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Grady Dalmida | |
Represented By: | Michele L. Berry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.