Harris et al v. Cooley et al
| Franklin David Jr Harris and Gwendolyn Gail Harris |
| Daniel Cooley, Kaylay Cooley and Chrissy Lodwick Spraughe |
| 1:2017cv00540 |
| August 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 43 Plaintiffs' Motion for Correction or Modification of the Record to Include a State Court Pleading. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/6/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 32 Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment and for Permanent Injunction. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment and for other relief including a permanent injunction 32 be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED in its entirety for failure to state any federal claim and for lack of federal jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 4/11/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the MagistrateJudge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 21) is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk shall enter defa ult against Defendants Daniel Cooley and Kaylay Cooley. The Motion (Doc. 21) is DENIED without prejudice to review as to Defendant Spraughe consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 23) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/26/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs most recent motion seeking service upon the Cooley Defendants (Doc. 17) is GRANTED in part, as described in paragraph 3 of this Order; 2. Plaintiffs earlier motions for the date that the U.S. Marsh al executed service (Docs. 13, 16) are DENIED AS MOOT; 3. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the complaint, the first amended complaint, Plaintiffs Notice of Erracta, the summons, and this Order upon the Defendants by ordinary mail, with all costs of service to be advanced by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/22/2017. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
7
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 09/13/2017. IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Clerk of Court shall transmit the summons forms to the United States Marshal, who shall serve a copy of the complaint, the summons, and this Orde r upon the Defendants as directed by Plaintiff. A copy of this Order shall be served on nonparty Margaret A. Burks, Esq., Chapter 13 Trustee, with additional courtesy copies to be transmitted to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, and to the Scioto Co unty Clerk of Court. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification. A copy of this order also sent this date to the Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Scioto County Clerk of Courts. Counsel for the trustee served this date via ECF.) Modified Docket Text on 9/13/2017 (bjc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
