Smith v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Ladon Smith |
| Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 1:2017cv00570 |
| August 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| ROSS |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS 20 21 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/10/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 17 Report and Recommendation denying 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/5/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 16 - Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/9/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 12 Report and Recommendation denying 8 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 7/27/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ladon Smith the Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/13/18. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS - Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (ECF No. 8) is without merit and should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 7/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/9/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ladon Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
