Abdulai Bundu v. Attorney General et al
Kamara Abdulai Bundu |
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. ICE Field Office Director and Warden, Immigration and Detention Facility |
1:2017cv00612 |
September 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
BUTLER |
Timothy S. Black |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/18/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). 2. Plaintiffs motion for a stay of removal (Doc. 7) be DENIED. 3. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 01/04/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.