Klein v. Vantiv, Inc. et al
| Filippo Macchia and Melvin Klein |
| Gary Lauer, Kevin Costello, Boon Sim, Mark Sunday, Mark Heimbouch, Lisa Hook, Vantiv, Inc., David Karnstedt, Charles Drucker, Lee Adrean and Jeffrey Stiefler |
| 1:2017cv00739 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Timothy S Black |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and Proposed Order by Plaintiff Melvin Klein. (Camillus, John) |
Filing 4
STIPULATION and ORDER concerning Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of the above Action and Plaintiff's Counsel's Anticipated Application for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/15/17. (sct)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION and Proposed Order by Plaintiff Melvin Klein. (Camillus, John) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Melvin Klein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PSLRA certification) (Camillus, John) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6191550), filed by Filippo Macchia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit PSLRA Certification) (Camillus, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
