Portnoy et al v. National Credit Systems, Inc. et al
Alyssa Portnoy and Darlene Portnoy |
National Credit Systems, Inc. and Williamsburg of Cincinnati |
Williamsburg of Cincinnati |
Alyssa Portnoy and Darlene Portnoy |
1:2017cv00834 |
December 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R. Barrett |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 ORDER denying 113 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 118 Motion for Order to Show Cause, 124 Motion to Stay, 127 Motion to Certify Class, 134 Motion for Hearing, 135 Motion for Hearing; and granting 120 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/14/2021. |
Filing 108 ORDER granting 75 Motion for Extension of Time; denying without prejudice 81 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying without prejudice 89 Motion for Order to; denying without prejudice 90 Motion for Sanctions; and finding as moot 92 Motion for Protective Order; denying 84 request for award of attorney's fees; follow up status conference to be scheduled. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 7/19/21. (ba) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/7/20. (ba) |
Filing 41 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/31/19. (ba) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.