Oatly AB et al v. D's Naturals LLC
| Oatly AB and Oatly, Inc. |
| D's Naturals LLC |
| D's Naturals LLC |
| Oatly AB |
| 1:2017cv00840 |
| December 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER (Redacted): The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART D's Naturals's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 87 ) and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Oatly's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 91 ) and enters judgmen t as follows:( 1) The Court GRANTS summary judgment for D's Naturals on its first counterclaim and STRIKES the Class 30 dry foods, as stipulated by the parties at ECF Doc. 99 -1, Pg. ID 2234, if 2, from the '246 Reg.(2) The Court GRANTS summary judgment for Oatly AB on D's Naturals' s second counterclaim.(3) The Court GRANTS summary judgment for Oatly AB on D's Naturals's third counterclaim.(4) The Court DENIES D's Naturals's Motion for Summary Judgment as it relates to Oatly's prayer for actual damages.(5) The Court DENIES Oatly AB's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of whether the WOW NO COW! mark has priority.(6) The Court SEALS this Opinion and DIRE CTS the parties, within 30 days of entry, to jointly file (a) a copy of this Opinion with proposed strikethroughs of only the material that should be redacted in the final version available to the public and (b) a brief addendum as to why each redact ion is necessary under Shane Group.In light of the above, the Court has entered summary judgment on all of D's Naturals's counterclaims. All of Oatly's claims remain pending before this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 05/24/2022. (kaf) Modified Docket Text on 5/24/2022 (bjc).
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS OATLY AB AND OATLY INC.'S MOTION TO PERMANENTLY SEAL DOCUMENTS (DOC. 109 ). Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 03/25/2021. (kaf)
|
|
Filing
110
Order Overruling 81 Objections and Affirming Magistrate Judge's 80 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 09/04/2020. (kaf)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Defendant D's Naturals' motion to supplement or amend its answer and counterclaims 70 71 is DENIED for the reasons stated under Rule 16; (2) The prior Order staying the summary judgment deadline 69 is vacated, with the parties to file summary judgment motions within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/3/2020. (km)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 28 Report and Recommendation denying 16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/27/18. (ba)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Counterclaims. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the second and third counterclaims 16 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/20/2018. (km)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
