Hamilton County Job and Family Services v. Bey
| Hamilton County Job and Family Services |
| Jaiyanah Bey |
| 1:2017cv00855 |
| December 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in its entirety. Defendant's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 15) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/20/18. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant's 15 MOTION for Reconsideration be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/21/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
13
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4 ), OVERRULING DEFENDANTS OBJECTION (Doc. 5 ), AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/1/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that in view of the previously filed R&R, Ms. Bey's 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and 9 MOTION to Strike should be Denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 8/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/1/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Jaiyanah Bey Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2018. IT IS RECOMMENDED: 1. Ms. Bey's petition for removal of a state court action to this federal court should be DENIED. 2. This matte r should be dismissed from the docket of the court. 3. This matter should be REMANDED back to the state court. 4. The Court should certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Repo rt and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Ms. Bey leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/22/2017. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hamilton County Job and Family Services v. Bey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jaiyanah Bey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hamilton County Job and Family Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
