Kanu v. Siemens PLM Software et al
| Bryan Kanu |
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati and Siemens PLM Software |
| 1:2018cv00037 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S Black |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER denying #21 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal the Complaint(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/23/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Seal Complaint(s) by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER of USCA as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Bryan Kanu dismissing cause for want of prosecution. Note: No Mandate details noted. (sct)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER of USCA as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Bryan Kanu denying the motion for reconsideration. Note: No Mandate details noted. (sct)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER of USCA as to #14 Notice of Appeal: The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED because an appeal in this case would be frivolous. Unless Kanu pays the $505 filing fee to the district court within thirty days of the entry of this order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Note: No Mandate details noted. (er)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER denying as moot #15 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis in light of this Court's prior ruling on the same issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/13/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 16
USCA Case Number 18-3742 for #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Bryan Kanu. Case Manager - Amy E. Gigliotti. (sct)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF APPEAL re #13 Clerk's Judgment by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/31/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 12
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. #8 ) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/31/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 11
(Stricken Per Order entered 7/31/18). AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Siemens PLM Software, University of Cincinnati, filed by Bryan Kanu. (jlw) Modified on 7/31/2018 (jlm).
|
|
Filing 10
OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying as moot #7 Plaintiff's Motion by Pro Se Litigant to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Rights. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/8/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #6 Amended Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be REVOKED based upon a lack of indigency, and he should be required to immediately pay the full $400.00 filing fee for this case. He should also be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed sua sponte with prejudice for failure to state any claim under Title VII or other federal law, either under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) if Plaintiff is permitted to continue to proceed in forma pauperis, or alternatively, under Apple v. Glenn. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/8/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Pro Se Litigant to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Rights by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (eh)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Bryan Kanu against Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Siemens PLM Software, University of Cincinnati. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights) (eh)
|
|
Filing 5
RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (eh)
|
|
Summons forms, USM-285 forms, and copies of the Amended Complaint received this date from Plaintiff. (eh)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Complaint filed by Bryan Kanu. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to file a timely amended complaint that comports with Rule 8 and the Order accompanying this Report and Recommendation; (2) In the alternative, if Plaintiff fails to timely submit an amended complaint on or before 2/8/2018, the undersigned recommends dismissal with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's Order regarding the submission of a complaint that meets the mandatory standard of Rule 8. Objections to R&R due by 2/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/29/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Siemens PLM Software, University of Cincinnati, filed by Bryan Kanu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER conditionally granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Because Plaintiff's application suggests that he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status, he shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 2/5/2018 why the conditional grant of in forma pauperis status should not be REVOKED and DENIED. In lieu of showing cause why the conditional grant of in forma pauperis status should not be revoked, Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $400.00 on or before 2/5/2018. Regardless of whether he seeks to proceed in forma pauperis or pays the full filing fee, Plaintiff shall tender a short, concise, amended complaint in compliance with Rule 8 on or before 2/8/2018. The amended compliant shall not exceed 20 pages in length, shall be typed in 12 point font, double-spaced, and with numbered paragraphs; Separate claims shall be labeled and clearly identified; Any exhibits to the amended complaint shall be attached to the complaint, but shall be clearly marked and separated from the complaint with a blank page marked EXHIBIT #, to precede each separate exhibit. To the extent that Plaintiff continues to seek in forma pauperis status, he must provide service copies of his entire complaint/exhibits, together with all other appropriate summons and U.S. Marshal forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/29/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Bryan Kanu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint) (bjc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/26/2018: #2 Complaint) (bjc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
