Durham v. Niffenegger et al
| David Durham |
| Jerry Niffenegger, Mark Purdy, James Christian, Target Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., John or Jane Doe #1 and John or Jane Doe #2-4 |
| 1:2018cv00091 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
192
ORDER consistent with this authority, the parties agreement, and the interest of judicial economy, defendants Motion to Tax Costs (Doc. 186 ) and Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. 187 ) are hereby STAYED pending the disposition of plaintiff's appeal. Within 30 days of the disposition of such appeal, plaintiffs shall respond to defendants motions, if warranted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/31/2024. (art)
|
|
Filing
184
OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 12/6/2023. (kmc)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER that Defendants motion 118 is DENIED. Plaintiffs motion for leave to supplement his rebuttal expert disclosure 125 is GRANTED. The discovery deadline is hereby extended to June 3, 2022, for the limited purpose of defendants having an opportunity to depose Dr. Manges, and the dispositive motion deadline is hereby extended to July 1, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/29/2022. (art)
|
|
Filing
121
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 105) AND DENYING DEFENDANT HOLLOPETER'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 94 ): The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant Hollopeter's Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (Doc. 94 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 03/03/2022. (kaf)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER entered following 10/27/2021 Informal telephone Discovery Conference. Defendant Hollopeters oral motion to be deposed remotely is GRANTED. However, if plaintiff strongly prefers an in-person deposition, Hollopeter may be deposed at a mutually agreeable location in the Lexington, Kentucky area.The parties will agree within seven days on dates for the two remaining depositions. The Court will entertain a joint motion for a brief extension of the November 15, 2021 discovery deadline if necessary to accommodate the newly scheduled depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/28/2021. (art)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER Plaintiff's motion 80 is therefore STRICKEN. Plaintiff is ORDERED to comply with the Court's Standing Order as referenced herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/28/2021. (art)
|
|
Filing
64
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/25/2020. (art)
|
|
Filing
60
Entry and Order Adopting 57 Report and Recommendation and Denying in Part 41 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 06/02/2020. (kaf)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (doc. 25); deft Walmart's motion to dismiss (doc. 16 is granted in part and denied in part; defts Target and Cristian's motion to dismiss (doc. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (vp)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Walmart's 16 MOTION to dismiss the complaint be Granted in part and Denied in part consistent with the foregoing; and that defendants Tart and Christian's 20 MOTION to dismiss the complaint be Granted in part and Denied in part consistent with the foregoing. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/5/2019. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
