Durham v. Niffenegger et al
||Jerry Niffenegger, Mark Purdy, James Christian, Target Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., John or Jane Doe #1 and John or Jane Doe #2-4
||February 9, 2018
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Susan J. Dlott
||Karen L. Litkovitz
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 26, 2019
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (doc. 25); deft Walmart's motion to dismiss (doc. 16 is granted in part and denied in part; defts Target and Cristian's motion to dismiss (doc. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (vp)
|March 5, 2019
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Walmart's 16 MOTION to dismiss the complaint be Granted in part and Denied in part consistent with the foregoing; and that defendants Tart and Christian's 20 MOTION to dismiss the complaint be Granted in part and Denied in part consistent with the foregoing. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/5/2019. (art)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?