Burfitt v. Erving et al
| Lawrence R. Burfitt, II |
| M. Erving, M. Esaum, R. Buroughton, Charlie Ruckel, T Parish, Brian Sparks, David Warren, Salyers, Brian Nolan, Roger Wilson, Cinthia Davis, Ron Erdos, Linnea Mahlman, Shannon Bear and Brian Felts |
| 1:2018cv00260 |
| April 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 22 Report and Recommendation denying 10 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/3/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 8 Report and Recommendation denying 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/21/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The complaint, as supplemented (Docs. 1-1, 1-6) be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff's Eigh tth Amendment excessive-force claims against defendants Erving, Ruckel, Parish, Esaum, Buroughton, Sparks, and Warren and plaintiff's Eigth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against defendant Nolan. 2. Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 1-3 & 1-4) be DENIED. 3. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny pl aintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, as supplemented (Docs. 1-1 & 1-6), summons, the separate Order issued granting the plaintiff in forma pauperis status, a nd this Order and Report and Recommendations upon defendants Erving Ruckel, Parish, Esaum, Buroughton, Sparks, Warren, and Nolan. 2. Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon defendants' attorney, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the court. 3. Plaintiff shall inform the court promptly of any changes in his address which may occur during the pendency of this lawsuit. ( Objections to R&R due by 5/17/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 05/03/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
