Bullocks v. C/O Hale et al
| Gerald Bullocks |
| Stephen Hale and Gary Hunley |
| 1:2018cv00288 |
| April 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, subject to the minor modification set forth in the order. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Bullocks' Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiff's Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 41), b ut ultimately DISMISSES Bullocks' Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 4/6/20. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
35
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, 28 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all claims presented 28 should be GRA NTED; (2) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 25 should be DENIED, and this case should be closed. Objections to R&R due by 6/6/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/23/2019. (km) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
