Cook v. Erdos et al
| Johnnie D. Cook |
| Ron Erdos and David McCroskey |
| 1:2018cv00341 |
| May 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/17/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997). Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 06/20/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
