Jewett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Jewett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Jewett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Tyrone Jewett
Respondent:	Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2018cv00406
Filed:	June 8, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	NOBLE
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 5, 2023	Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21 ). Respondent's motion to lift the stay (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for an enlargement or extension of time to continue the stay (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED to allow this case to remain stayed while Petitioner exhausts his claim for relief. Signed by Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 5/5/2023. (kmc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 8, 2020	Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER overruling 13 Jewett's Objection and adopting 10 Report and Recommendation as to Grounds 1-4 of the habeas petition. The Court stays further consideration of the petition based on the "Newly Discovered Evidence" to allow Jewett an opportunity to exhaust the claim in state court. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 10/8/20. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 5, 2023

Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21 ). Respondent's motion to lift the stay (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for an enlargement or extension of time to continue the stay (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED to allow this case to remain stayed while Petitioner exhausts his claim for relief. Signed by Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins on 5/5/2023. (kmc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

October 8, 2020

Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER overruling 13 Jewett's Objection and adopting 10 Report and Recommendation as to Grounds 1-4 of the habeas petition. The Court stays further consideration of the petition based on the "Newly Discovered Evidence" to allow Jewett an opportunity to exhaust the claim in state court. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 10/8/20. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jewett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyrone Jewett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Represented By:	William H Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?