Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jerome R. Wilson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
1:2018cv00436 |
June 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R Barrett |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shefali Baltz for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Baltz, Shefali) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Sent to the US Marshal for service with USM-285 forms and copies of the complaint and #2 Order. (eh) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Jerome R. Wilson against Commissioner of Social Security. (eh) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and authorizing commencement of this action without prepayment of fees or costs.Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/2/18. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jerome R. Wilson (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents). (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.