Dapper et al v. Board of Trustees of Anderson Township Ohio
Kathleen Dapper and Stephen H. Dapper |
Kathleen A. Dapper |
Board of Trustees of Anderson Township Ohio |
1:2018cv00665 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE by Appellee Board of Trustees of Anderson Township Ohio Correspondence to Clerk of Courts (Attachments: #1 Exhibit docket text information) (Fischer, Cynthia) |
Filing 2 Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Certification of Record on Appeal. Appellant Brief due by 11/5/2018. Appellee Brief due by 11/19/2018. Appellant Reply Brief due by 12/3/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal Doc. # 37, #2 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Doc. # 34, #3 Motion to Dismiss Doc # 10) (sct) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT filed by Kathleen Dapper, Stephen H. Dapper. The parties briefing schedule will be established once the District Court receives the Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Certification of Record on Appeal. Bankruptcy Court case number 1:18-bk-11693. (Attachments: #1 Order of Dismissal, #2 Transmittal Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Docket Sheet) (sct) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.