Chibinda et al v. Columbus Field Office Director (ICE) et al
Peter Chibinda and Dora Chibinda |
Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General of the United States, Craig Southern, Columbus Field Office Director (ICE), Williams and Assistant Secretary of DHS for ICE |
1:2018cv00780 |
November 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Susan J Dlott |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William Bryan King, II for Respondents Assistant Secretary of DHS for ICE, Attorney General of the United States, Columbus Field Office Director (ICE), Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Craig Southern, Williams (King, William) |
Filing 2 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that respondents shall, within forty (40) days of the date of this Order, file an answer responding to the allegations of the habeas petition in which petitioners challenge their continued detention following a removal order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/12/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Peter Chibinda, Dora Chibinda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (bjc) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100CIN035428 (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.