Johnson v. Greater Cincinnati Water Works
| David A Johnson |
| Greater Cincinnati Water Works |
| 1:2018cv00868 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: The parties Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due to be filed with the Court by 2/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/24/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Greater Cincinnati Water Works. (Bissinger, Julie) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Creditt Mai for Defendant Greater Cincinnati Water Works (Creditt Mai, Lauren) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Greater Cincinnati Water Works. (jlw) |
|
Filing 7
NOTATION ORDER granting defendant's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Greater Cincinnati Water Works answer due 1/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/3/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint New date requested 1/23/2019. by Defendant Greater Cincinnati Water Works. (Bissinger, Julie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie Furber Bissinger for Defendant Greater Cincinnati Water Works (Bissinger, Julie) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Greater Cincinnati Water Works and sent to the marshal for service. (jlw) Modified on 12/12/2018 (jlw). |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Greater Cincinnati Water Works, filed by David A Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jlw) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/12/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff David A Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Greater Cincinnati Water Works | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greater Cincinnati Water Works | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Creditt Mai |
| Represented By: | Julie Furber Bissinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David A Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
