Emrit v. Soros et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Federal Communications Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, George Soros and Federal Trade Commission |
| 1:2019cv00019 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of Columbia as case 1:19-cv-00059, filed 01/11/2019. (er) |
Filing 2
ORDER: This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/9/2019. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred to District of United States District Court for the District of Columbia.Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (jlw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: service copies, summons and US marshal forms) by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
