Diaby v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen
Petitioner: Mohamed Diaby
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 1:2019cv00026
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Susan J Dlott
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting respondent's second #5 Motion for Extension of Time up through and including 3/11/2019 in which to file answer, move or otherwise plead in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/5/2019. (art)
March 5, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security answer due 3/11/2019. (art)
March 4, 2019 Filing 5 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 3/11/2019. For Respondent to Answer and Return Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Secretary, Department of Homeland Security. (King, William)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting respondent's #3 Motion for Extension of Time up to and including 3/4/2019 in which to file answer, move or otherwise plead in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/26/2019. (art)
February 26, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security answer due 3/4/2019. (art)
February 25, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 3/4/2019. For Respondent to Answer and Return Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Secretary, Department of Homeland Security. (King, William)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER - Respondant shall, within forty (40) days of the date of this Order, file an answer responding to the allegations of the habeas petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/11/19. (eh)
January 15, 2019 Notice of Mailing by Clerk: Docs. #1 & #2 sent by regular mail this date to the Butler County Sheriff and the Office of the United States Attorney. (eh)
January 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0648-6744869.), filed by Mohamed Diaby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wang, Charleston)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaby v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mohamed Diaby
Represented By: Charleston Cheng Kung Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: William Bryan King, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?