Williams v. Tharp et al
| Jerome Williams |
| Sgt. Kowalski, Sgt. Collens, B. Curtis, John Tharp, Unknown Lucas County Sheriff's Doctor and Lucas County Sheriff John Tharp |
| 1:2019cv00031 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in Northern District of Ohioas case 3:19-cv-00201, filed 01/25/2019. #3 Order, (pb) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER - the Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 01/25/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred to Northern District of Ohio, Western Division. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (bjc) |
| Filing 2 Cashier's Certificate and AFFIDAVIT of Indigency by Plaintiff Jerome Williams. (sct) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jerome Williams. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 U.S. Marshal Forms) (sct) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
