White v. Dillow et al
Jermeal White |
Michael Dillow and Gary C. Mohr |
1:2019cv00033 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Civil Cover Sheet, SUmmons Forms for All Defendants, USM-285 Forms for All Defendants, and Service Copies of the Complaint) by Plaintiff Jermeal White. (bjc) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Jermeal White. (bjc) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER - Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay $400 ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) or submit to the Court an in forma pauperis application and certified copy of plaintiffs prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-month period within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 01/17/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Dillow, Gary C. Mohr, filed by Jermeal White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.