Poston v. Aramark Business Facilities, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Scott Poston
Defendant: Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Aramark Business Facilities, LLC and Hamilton County, Ohio
Case Number: 1:2019cv00144
Filed: February 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Barrett
Referring Judge: William O Bertelsman
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2019 Filing 18 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Aramark Business Facilities, LLC. (Evans, R)
April 18, 2019 Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Aramark Business Facilities, LLC. (Evans, R)
April 18, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L Barbiere for Defendants Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Hamilton County, Ohio, Cross Claimants Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Hamilton County, Ohio (Barbiere, Katherine)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 4/15/19. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/29/2019. (eh)
April 10, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Aramark Business Facilities, LLC filed by Hamilton County, Ohio, Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Contract) (Barbiere, Lawrence)
March 26, 2019 Reset Deadlines: Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. answer due 4/19/2019. (bjc)
March 25, 2019 Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Plead by Defendant Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.. (Benintendi, John)
March 25, 2019 Reset Deadlines: Aramark Business Facilities, LLC answer due 4/12/2019. (sct)
March 22, 2019 Filing 12 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Defendant Aramark Business Facilities, LLC. Amendment to #11 Stipulation . (Kleinman, Megan)
March 22, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION Stipulated Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Plead by Defendant Aramark Business Facilities, LLC. (Kleinman, Megan)
March 22, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Hamilton County, Ohio answer due 4/11/2019. (jlw)
March 21, 2019 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Plead on Behalf of Defendant Hamilton County, Ohio by Defendant Hamilton County, Ohio. (Vollman, Mark)
March 12, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019. (eh)
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William O. Bertelsman for all further proceedings. Judge Michael R. Barrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/8/19. (ba)
March 8, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John Knox Benintendi for Defendant Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. (Benintendi, John)
March 5, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Hamilton County, Ohio served on 3/1/2019, answer due 3/22/2019. (eh)
March 4, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Aramark Business Facilities, LLC. Aramark Business Facilities, LLC served on 3/1/2019, answer due 3/22/2019. (bjc)
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Mailing: A summons and complaint have been sent via certified mail by the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on February 27, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jlw)
February 26, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Aramark Business Facilities, LLC, Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Hamilton County, Ohio. (sct)
February 26, 2019 ***If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (sct)
February 25, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons, #2 Summons Form Summons) (Hoskins, Kevin)
February 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6808848), filed by Scott Poston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Hoskins, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poston v. Aramark Business Facilities, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence Edward Barbiere
Represented By: John Knox Benintendi
Represented By: Katherine L Barbiere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Business Facilities, LLC
Represented By: Megan H. Kleinman
Represented By: R Leland Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hamilton County, Ohio
Represented By: Lawrence Edward Barbiere
Represented By: Mark Carl Vollman
Represented By: Katherine L Barbiere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Poston
Represented By: Kevin F Hoskins
Represented By: Christopher Markus
Represented By: Kathleen Cassidy Tranter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?