Wilson et al v. Rack Seven Paving Co. et al
| Daniel Wilson, Mark Hammock, Robert Duffy, Harold Taylor and Thomas Mauch |
| Rack Seven Paving Co., Timothy Rack and Kevin Rack |
| 1:2019cv00163 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Timothy Rack. (Hageman, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Kevin Rack. (Hageman, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Rack Seven Paving Co.. (Hageman, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mark Hammock, Harold Taylor, Robert Duffy, Daniel Wilson, Thomas Mauch.Originally filed in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court on 1/29/19. (sct) |
| ***If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (sct) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Rack Seven Paving Co., Rack Seven Paving Co. identifying Corporate Parent Rack Seven Paving Co. for Rack Seven Paving Co... (Hageman, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 1900498 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6818633), filed by Rack Seven Paving Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Hageman, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
