Dixon v. Hunt
| William Dixon |
| Deborah Hunt |
| 1:2019cv00338 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion by Deborah Hunt for Extension of Time until 7/24/19 to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/26/19. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Respond to Court and Defendant by Plaintiff William Dixon. (sct) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 7/24/2019. by Defendant Deborah Hunt. (King, William) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting defendant's #4 Motion for Extension of Time through and including 6/24/2019 in which to answer, move or otherwise plead in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/7/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 6/24/2019. by Defendant Deborah Hunt. (King, William) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant answer due by 6/24/2019. (art) |
| Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz added. (jlw) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Deborah Hunt, filed by William Dixon. Filed in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas filed on 4/1/2019. (jlw) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (jlw) |
|
Notation Order: This civil action is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. 2). For good cause shown, that motion (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 3) on or before 6/7/19. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/7/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 6/7/2019. by Defendant Deborah Hunt. (King, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 1901600, filed by Deborah Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint) (King, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. Hunt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Dixon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Deborah Hunt | |
| Represented By: | William Bryan King, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
