Erwin-El v. Genesee County Land Bank Auth. et al
| Robert L. Erwin-El |
| Judge: Perry, Genesee Count Land Bank Auth., Jeremy R.M. Piper and Genesee County Land Bank Auth. |
| 1:2019cv00377 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - The Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/23/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in Eastern District of Michigan as case 2:19-cv-11522, filed 05/23/2019.. (sct) |
| Case transferred to the USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (km) Modified Docket Text on 5/23/2019 (km). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Genesee Count Land Bank Auth., Perry, Jeremy R.M. Piper, filed by Robert L. Erwin-El. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee Receipt) (jlw) |
| Filing 1 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 100cin36807 (jlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
