Goins v. Burlington Coat Factory
| Rosemary Goins |
| Burlington Coat Factory |
| 1:2019cv00390 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Burlington Coat Factory and sent to the U.S. Marshals for service along with a USM-285 Form, copy of the complaint, copy of the order granting IFP, and the order issuing service. (bjc) |
Filing 6
ORDER - 1. The Report and Recommendation filed on May 31, 2019 (Doc. 4) is VACATED AS MOOT; 2. The Clerk of Court shall transmit the summons form to the United States Marshal, who shall serve a copy of the complaint, the summons, and this Order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon the Defendant as directed by Plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff shall serve upon each Defendant or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Defendants attorney(s), a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. 4. Plaintiff shall keep the Court apprised of her current address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 06/24/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 5 Letter/OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Rosemary Goins. (Attachments: #1 Right to Sue Letter) (eh) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Complaint filed by Rosemary Goins. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim, and that this case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/31/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Burlington Coat Factory, filed by Rosemary Goins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/31/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Rosemary Goins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint) (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goins v. Burlington Coat Factory | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosemary Goins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Burlington Coat Factory | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
