Sweeting v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corection et al
| Derrick Sweeting |
| Department of Rehabilitation and Corection, Remish, Roger Wolfe, Seech Ceo and Mrs. Palmer |
| 1:2019cv00459 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of Courts to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/24/19. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in Northern District of Ohio as case 4:19-cv-01454, filed 06/24/2019. (sct) |
| Case transferred to Northern District of Ohio. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (sct) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Copies of Complaint, Summons, and USM285 forms) by Plaintiff Derrick Sweeting. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (sct) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
