White v. Erdos et al
| Jermeal White |
| C. Duckworth, R. Erdos and David Dunlap |
| 1:2019cv00470 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to David Dunlap and sent to the marshal for service. (jlw) |
Filing 9
ORDER : It is hereby ORDERED that the United States Marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons, the Order granting plaintiff leave to proceed informa pauperis, and this Order upondefendant David Dunlap as directed by plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/5/2019. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re #6 Report and Recommendation dismissing complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)and 191 SA(b )(1 ) with the exception of plaintiff's excessive force claim against defendant Dunlap. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 8/2/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Jermeal White. (sct) |
| Plaintiff has submitted a summons and US Marshal form for Defendant David Dunlap. (sct) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: The complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)and 191 SA(b )(1 ), with the exception of plaintiffs excessive force claim against defendant Dunlap. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, submit a completed summons and U.S. Marshal form for service on defendant Dunlap.( Objections to R&R due by 7/31/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 07/17/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 07/17/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Service copies of the complaint, summons forms, USM-285 Forms, and a civil cover sheet) by Plaintiff Jermeal White. (bjc) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Jermeal White. (bjc) |
|
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER: Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to pay $400 ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) or submit to the Court an in forma pauperis application and certified copy of plaintiff's prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-month period within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/24/19. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C. Duckworth, David Dunlap, R. Erdos, filed by Jermeal White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (bjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
