Shipmon v. Eyemed Vision Care LLC
| Deloise Shipmon |
| Eyemed Vision Care LLC d/b/a Luxottica and Eyemed Vision Care LLC |
| 1:2019cv00559 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Notation Order: This case is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration. #3 . For good cause shown, that motion #3 is GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending the outcome of the parties' arbitration. On or before 11/29/19, the parties shall jointly notify the Court via email to Chambers (black_chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov) of the status of this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/29/19. (rrs)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Defendant Eyemed Vision Care LLC. (Bond, Kasey) |
| Set Deadlines per doc. #2 : Eyemed Vision Care LLC answer due 8/27/2019. (eh) |
| Filing 2 STIPULATION for Extension by Defendant Eyemed Vision Care LLC. (Milligan, John) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Eyemed Vision Care LLC d/b/a Luxottica ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7002621), filed by Deloise Shipmon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Imm, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
