Lahey et al v. Gates
Plaintiff: Timothy Peter Lahey and Patricia Lynn Lahey
Defendant: Bill Gates
Case Number: 1:2019cv00620
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Susan J Dlott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT affirming #5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 8/22/2019. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED based upon a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction, because it is legally frivolous, and because it fails to state any claim against the defendant under state or federal law. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 5, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Complaint filed by Timothy Peter Lahey. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this case be DISMISSED based upon a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction, because it is legally frivolous, and because it fails to state any claim against the Defendant under state or federal law. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/5/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 5, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Bill Gates, filed by Timothy Peter Lahey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km)
August 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff Timothy Lahey's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/5/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Completed Summons and Copy of the Complaint) by Plaintiff Timothy Peter Lahey. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (sct)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lahey et al v. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Peter Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Lynn Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?