Dillingham v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
Plaintiff: Latoyia N Dillingham
Defendant: Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Case Number: 1:2019cv00849
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Susan J Dlott
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7230220) of Joseph W. Borchelt by Defendants Laboratory Corporation of America, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing of Karen Spain) (Borchelt, Joseph)
December 5, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7230198) of Joseph W. Borchelt by Defendants Laboratory Corporation of America, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing of David Garraux) (Borchelt, Joseph)
November 25, 2019 Reset Deadlines: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings answer due 12/16/2019. (bjc)
November 22, 2019 Filing 4 STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. (Borchelt, Joseph)
November 7, 2019 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Laboratory Corporation of America on 10/3/2019, answer due 12/2/2019; Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings on 10/3/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Miller-Novak, Matthew)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (vp)
October 8, 2019 If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (jlw)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Laboratory Corporation of America, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7143314), filed by Latoyia N Dillingham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Miller-Novak, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dillingham v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laboratory Corporation of America
Represented By: Joseph W Borchelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Represented By: Joseph W Borchelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoyia N Dillingham
Represented By: Robert Lee Thompson
Represented By: Matthew Miller-Novak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?