Crane v. Pacific Associates Corp.
| Christopher Crane |
| Pacific Associates Corp., Shain Mercer and John Does 1-3 |
| 1:2019cv00877 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/18/2019. This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division at Columbus. (eh)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Pacific Associates Corp. (eh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 9/23/2019 in Licking County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. 19CV01003) by Christopher Crane against Shain Mercer, Pacific Associates Corp., and John Does 1-3. (eh) |
| Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Eastern Division at Columbus as case number 2:19CV4632. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:19CV4632. (eh) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint filed by All Defendants. (Loepp, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Licking County Court of Common Pleas, case number 19CV01003 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7157613), filed by Pacific Associates Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Corporate Disclosure, #3 State Court Complaint) (Loepp, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
