Ndukwe et al v. Walker, Jr. et al
Plaintiff: Chinedum Ndukwe and Kingsley Consulting, LLC
Defendant: Jane Doe, James L. Walker, Jr., John Doe, J. Walker & Associates, LLC and Attorney Doe
Case Number: 1:2019cv00888
Filed: October 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Barrett
Referring Judge: Timothy S Black
2 Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of #6 Motion for Remand by Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe. (Croswell, Robert) Modified docket text on 5/19/2020 (eh).
January 13, 2020 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Strike #11 Reply to Response to Motion or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply filed by Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe. (Croswell, Robert)
January 7, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Strike #11 Reply to Response to Motion or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply by Defendants Attorney Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe, J. Walker & Associates, LLC, James L. Walker, Jr.. (Durst, Alexander)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Matthew W. McFarland for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/3/2020. (ss)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 30, 2019 Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe. (Croswell, Robert)
December 19, 2019 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Defendants Attorney Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe, J. Walker & Associates, LLC, James L. Walker, Jr.. (Durst, Alexander)
November 27, 2019 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand New date requested 12/19/2019. by Defendants Attorney Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe, J. Walker & Associates, LLC, James L. Walker, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension) (Durst, Alexander)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Notation Order: This civil action is before the Court on Defendants unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs motion to remand. (Doc. 9). For good cause shown, that motion (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. 6) on or before 12/19/19. IT IS SO ORDERED.. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/27/2019. (jlw)
November 8, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John L. O'Shea for Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe (O'Shea, John)
November 7, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time by Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe. (Croswell, Robert) Modified Docket Text and Event Type on 11/7/2019 (bjc).
November 7, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiffs Kingsley Consulting, LLC, Chinedum Ndukwe. (Croswell, Robert) Modified Event Type and Docket Text on 11/7/2019 (bjc).
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Notation Order: This civil action is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend the Time within which to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (Doc. #7 ). The Court has confirmed, via email, that Defendants will consent to a "reasonable extension" of time. For good cause shown, Plaintiffs' motion (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs SHALL respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. #3 #4 ), within 21 days after the Court issues a decision on the motion to remand (Doc. #6 ), in the event that the motion to remand (Doc. #6 ) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/7/19. (rrs)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. Judge Michael R. Barrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/22/19. (ba)
October 22, 2019 ***If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (sct)
October 21, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss of Defendants Jane Doe and Attorney Doe, and Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings of Defendant John Doe by Defendants Attorney Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe. (Durst, Alexander). Added MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings on 10/22/2019 (sct).
October 21, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative for a Transfer of Venue by Defendants J. Walker & Associates, LLC, James L. Walker, Jr.. (Durst, Alexander). Added MOTION to Change Venue on 10/22/2019 (sct).
October 21, 2019 Filing 2 Defendant John Doe's ANSWER to Complaint filed by John Doe. (Durst, Alexander)
October 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 1904437 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7161524), filed by James L. Walker, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Durst, Alexander)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ndukwe et al v. Walker, Jr. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Represented By: Alexander Jacob Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James L. Walker, Jr.
Represented By: Alexander Jacob Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Alexander Jacob Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Walker & Associates, LLC
Represented By: Alexander Jacob Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney Doe
Represented By: Alexander Jacob Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chinedum Ndukwe
Represented By: Donald John Rafferty
Represented By: Robert Scott Croswell, III
Represented By: John L. O'Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kingsley Consulting, LLC
Represented By: Donald John Rafferty
Represented By: Robert Scott Croswell, III
Represented By: John L. O'Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?