Brock v. Hamilton County Sheriffs et al
Felicia Brock |
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts and Hamilton County Sheriffs |
1:2019cv00915 |
October 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Susan J Dlott |
Karen L Litkovitz |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Felicia Brock. (eh) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/31/2019. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: Plaintiff's #3 Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2019. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Felicia Brock against Hamilton County Clerk of Courts, Hamilton County Sheriffs. (eh) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and authorizing commencement of this action without prepayment of fees or costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/31/2019. (eh) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Felicia Brock. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons and USM-285 Forms) (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.