Healy v. Lavell
Plaintiff: Noahnatheil Healy and Noahnathaniel Healy
Defendant: Dr. Casey Lavell
Case Number: 1:2019cv00931
Filed: November 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Black
Referring Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 31, 2019 Filing 6 DECISION AND ENTRY adopting Report and Recommendations re #4 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/31/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 16, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Google Search by Plaintiff Noahnathaniel Healy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Complaint filed by Noahnathaniel Healy. IT IS RECOMMENDED this action be DISMISSED with PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim for relief. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 12/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/2/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 2, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Casey Lavell, filed by Noahnathaniel Healy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/2/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 4, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons Form, Marshal Form, and Service Documents) by Plaintiff Noahnatheil Healy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Envelope) (daf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Healy v. Lavell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Casey Lavell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noahnatheil Healy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noahnathaniel Healy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?