Ceo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Marlene Ceo and Marlene Roxanne Ceo |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2019cv00934 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Karen L Litkovitz |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/13/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Rake, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ameenah Lewis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Lewis, Ameenah) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Sent to the US Marshal for service with USM-285 forms and copies of the #3 Complaint and #2 Order for service. (eh) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Marlene Roxanne Ceo against Commissioner of Social Security. (eh) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and authorizing commencement of this action without prepayment of fees or costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/5/2019. (eh) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Marlene Ceo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form) (Rake, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.