Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Bungalow Home, LLC
| RH US, LLC and Restoration Hardware, Inc. |
| Bungalow Home, LLC |
| 1:2019cv00958 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - The Court, upon a review of the record, notes that the above-styled case was erroneously filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Cincinnati. Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1, this case is hereby TRANFERRED to the Eastern Division at Columbus. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/12/2019. (bjc)
|
| Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Eastern Division - Columbus as case number 2:19-cv-4978. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:19-cv-4978. (bjc) |
| If this case is referred, ti will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (bjc) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Restoration Hardware, Inc.. (Bryan, Beth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bungalow Home, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7194125), filed by Restoration Hardware, Inc., RH US, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Trademark registrations, #2 Summons Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryan, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
