Perry v. Warden Warren Correctional Institution et al
| Marquez Perry and Marquez B. Perry |
| State of Ohio Department of Corrections an Rehabilitation, Lt. Little, Issac Harris, Warden Warren Correctional Institution, Investigator Office, Kevin Freeman and Mr. Furnier |
| 1:2020cv00030 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Copies of Greivances by Plaintiff Marquez B. Perry (jlw)
|
Filing 5
MOTION for the Court to Accept Dual Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Marquez B. Perry. (jlw)
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Marquez B. Perry. (jlw)
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Amend Original Complaint by Plaintiff Marquez B. Perry. (cb)
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Amend the Complaint by Plaintiff Marquez B. Perry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (bjc)
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons and USM-285 Forms for all defendants except for Warden, Warren Correctional Institution) by Plaintiff Marquez Perry. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel, #4 Envelopes) (bjc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.