Williams v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Chris Williams |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 1:2020cv00099 |
| February 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Williams' Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying #1 Williams' prior, incomplete Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is ordered to pay the full filing fee of $5.00 within thirty (30) day of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 3/17/20. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Petitioner Chris Williams. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Douglas R. Cole for all further proceedings. Judge William O. Bertelsman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/13/2020. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT within thirty (30) days of the date of filing of this Order, petitioner shall pay the full filing fee of $5.00 or submit a completed Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form, including the "Certificate" page (page 8 of the application and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of feesthat is used in this Court, completed and signed by the institutional cashier) showing the balance of his prisoner account, as well as an attached certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement showing at least the past six months' transactions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 02/10/2020. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Petitioner Chris Williams. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (jlw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Chris Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
