Howard v. System Design Advantage, LLC
Jacques Howard |
System Design Advantage, LLC dba Flash Global Logistics and System Design Advantage, LLC |
1:2020cv00365 |
May 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Matthew W McFarland |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order Transferring Case. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 05/08/2020. (kaf) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 7/8/2019 in Franklin County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. 19CV005481) by Jacques Howard against System Design Advantage, LLC. (eh) |
Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Eastern Division at Columbus as case number 2:20cv2312. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:20cv2312. (kaf) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant System Design Advantage, LLC dba Flash Global Logistics. (Treherne, Gretchen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, case number 19cv005481 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7456543), filed by System Design Advantage, LLC dba Flash Global Logistics. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Treherne, Gretchen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.