Fifth Third Bank v. Home Town Motors IV, Inc.
| Fifth Third Bank |
| Home Town Motors IV, Inc. and Home Town Motors IV, Inc. doing business as Mike Murphy Kia |
| 1:2020cv00759 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (sct) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Fifth Third Bank (Gilley, R.) |
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Douglas R. Cole for all further proceedings. J Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/20/2020. (ss)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Home Town Motors IV, Inc. (kl) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kl) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs Fifth Third Bank, Fifth Third Bancorp identifying Corporate Parent Fifth Third Bancorp for Fifth Third Bank.. (Gilley, R.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Home Town Motors IV, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7668631), filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Dealer Agreement, #2 Exhibit B--Avery Dixon, #3 Exhibit C--Frankie Parks, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form) (Gilley, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
