Lanier v. Lawson et al
Leonard Lanier |
Lt. R. Osbourne, Gary Lawson and Linnea Mahlman |
1:2020cv00770 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint #8 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 11/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 11/16/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified Docket Text to Correct Link on 11/17/2020 (km). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File An Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Leonard Lanier. (kh) |
|
|
|
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Leonard Lanier. (km) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Gary Lawson, R. Osbourne, filed by Leonard Lanier. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km) |
|
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Leonard Lanier. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Assistance in Obtaining Counsel, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Form, #5 USM 285 Form, #6 Envelope) (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.