Conger v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
David Conger |
The Proctor & Gamble Company, The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, AstraZeneca LP, Mereck & Co., Inc. doing business as Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Pfizer Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP |
1:2020cv00851 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Susan J Dlott |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:20-cv-16404, filed 11/18/2020. (er) |
Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-29): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, this action is transferred to the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 11/16/2020; certified by the District of New Jersey's Clerk's Office on 11/16/2020. (er) |
Case transferred to District of New Jersey. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (er) |
Filing 10 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-29): This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 11/16/2020. (er) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. Judge Susan J. Dlott no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 11/2/20. (eh) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 8/2/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by AstraZeneca LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. (eh) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 8/2/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by Merck & Co., Inc. (eh) Modified to correct filers on 10/30/2020 (eh). Modified docket text on 11/3/2020 (kh). |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 7/23/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company. (eh) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 7/23/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (eh) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 7/8/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by Defendant Pfizer Inc. (eh) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 5/30/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902622) by David Conger against AstraZeneca LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Mereck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc., The Proctor & Gamble Company, The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company. (eh) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Pfizer Inc.. (Pitcairn, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, OH, case number A1902622 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7731920), filed by Pfizer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Removal Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Hamilton County Docket, #4 Exhibit B - Transfer Order) (Pitcairn, Robert) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.