BUTLER v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
| Carolyn R. Butler |
| AstraZeneca LP, Merck & Co., Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP |
| 1:2020cv00852 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Timothy S Black |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-30): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on MDL this action is transferred to the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 12/1/2020; certified by the Clerk's Office District of New Jersey on 12/1/2020. (er) |
| Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-30): This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the USDC for the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 12/1/2020. (er) |
| Case transferred to District of New Jersey. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (er) |
| ***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:20-cv-17902, filed 12/03/2020. (er) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Black for all further proceedings. Judge Susan J. Dlott no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 11/3/2020. (jlw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Susan J. Dlott for all further proceedings. Judge Michael R. Barrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/2/20. (ba)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 8/2/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902615) filed by Merck & Co., Inc. (eh) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand originally filed 8/2/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902615) by AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP. (eh) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 5/30/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902615) by Carolyn R. Butler against AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company. (eh) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP identifying Corporate Parent AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP; Corporate Parent AstraZeneca LP for AstraZeneca LP.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from HAMILTON COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, case number A 1902615 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7731935), filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Daniel) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
