Sandy Elchert v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
Sandy Elchert |
AstraZeneca LP, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc. doing business as Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation, The Procter & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company |
1:2020cv00870 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:20-cv-16520, filed 11/19/2020. (er) |
Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-29): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, this action is transferred to the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 11/16/2020; certified by the District of New Jersey's Clerk's Office on 11/16/2020. (er) |
Case transferred to District of New Jersey. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (er) |
Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-29): This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 11/16/2020. (er) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Dismissal of Defendants The Procter & Gamble Company and the Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company Only Without Prejudice originally filed 10/09/2020, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, A1902723. (kh) Modified to include original file information on 11/9/2020 (kl). |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP. in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A1902723. (kh) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/4/2020) (kh). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A1902723. (kh) (Main Document 5 replaced on 11/4/2020) (kh). |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation filed by Sandy Elchert in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. A1902723. (kh) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/4/2020) (kh). |
[PLEASE DISREGARD-FILED IN ERROR BY CLERK.] If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) Modified on 11/2/2020 (kh). |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kh) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP identifying Corporate Parent AstraZeneca LP for AstraZeneca LP; Corporate Parent Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A 1902723 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7732700), filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, AstraZeneca LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.